Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

Search interest around chicago bears vs washington commanders match player stats is driven by readers who want verified on-field numbers. This matchup brings together two franchises with long league histories, shifting identities, and games shaped by quarterback output, rushing balance, and defensive workload.

This page focuses on player-level performance, team totals, scoring flow, and historical context. Every section centers on what happened between the lines, using measurable results rather than opinion or prediction.Latest meeting stats (Oct 13, 2025)

Final: Bears 25, Commanders 24
Quarter scores: CHI 6–7–3–9 | WSH 0–7–10–7 

Passing

• Bears (Caleb Williams): 17/29, 252 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT
• Commanders (Jayden Daniels): 19/26, 211 yards, 3 TD, 1 INT
  

Rushing

• Bears: D’Andre Swift 14 carries, 108 yards; Caleb Williams 4 carries, 3 yards, 1 rush TD
  
• Commanders: Jacory Croskey-Merritt 17 carries, 61 yards; Jayden Daniels 10 carries, 52 yards
  

Receiving

• Bears leaders:
  
  • D’Andre Swift 2 catches, 67 yards, 1 TD (long 55)
    
  • Luther Burden III 4 catches, 51 yards
• Commanders leaders:
  
  • Zach Ertz 6 catches, 43 yards, 1 TD
    
  • Chris Moore 3 catches, 46 yards, 1 TD
    
  • Luke McCaffrey 1 catch, 33 yards, 1 TD
    

Defense + turnovers (quick insert)

• Bears interception: Jaquan Brisker 1 INT, 32 return yards
• Fumbles lost: Washington lost 2 fumbles; Chicago lost 0
  

Special teams (kicking + returns)

• Bears (Jake Moody): 4/5 FG, long 48; 1/1 XP (13 points)
  
• Commanders (Matt Gay): 1/2 FG, long 53; 3/3 XP (6 points)
  
• Kick returns: Devin Duvernay 5 for 120 (24.0 avg); Luke McCaffrey 4 for 127 (31.8 avg)
  

Recent high-scoring meeting stats (Oct 5, 2023)

Final: Bears 40, Commanders 20
Quarter scores: CHI 10–17–0–13 | WSH 0–3–11–6 

Passing

• Bears (Justin Fields): 15/29, 282 yards, 4 TD, 0 INT
  
• Commanders (Sam Howell): 37/51, 388 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT
  

Rushing

• Bears leaders: Khalil Herbert 10 carries, 76 yards; Justin Fields 11 carries, 57 yards
• Commanders: team 10 carries, 29 yards (Brian Robinson Jr. 6 carries, 10 yards)
  

Receiving

• Bears (DJ Moore): 8 catches, 230 yards, 3 TD (long 58) 
• Commanders leaders: Logan Thomas 9 catches, 77 yards, 1 TD; Curtis Samuel 6 catches, 65 yards, 1 TD
  

Defense

• Bears sacks: team 5.0 sacks (T.J. Edwards 1.0; Greg Stroman Jr. 1.0; others split)
  
• Bears interception: Greg Stroman Jr. 1 INT

Historic “Bears vs Commanders 73–0” stats (Dec 8, 1940)

Game: 1940 NFL Championship Game
Final: Chicago Bears 73, Washington (Redskins) 0

Team totals snapshot

• Total yards: Bears 501, Washington 245
  
• Rushing: Bears 382 on 57 carries; Washington 22 on 14 carries
  
• Passing: Bears 7/10 for 119; Washington 20/51 for 223
  
• Interceptions: Bears 8 (117 return yards); Washington 0

Key individual lines (from the game stats)

• Sid Luckman: 3/4 passing, 88 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT
• Bill Osmanski: 10 carries, 109 yards, 1 TD (long 68)
  
  Sammy Baugh: 10/17 passing, 102 yards, 0 TD, 2 INT

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Score Overview

Fans often look for the score first before scanning player output. Bears vs Commanders games tend to stay within one score, with possession control and turnover margin shaping outcomes.

Recent meetings show both teams relying on short passing sequences and situational rushing. Final scores rarely tell the full story, which makes player stats essential for context.

Quarter scoring often swings late, with fourth-quarter drives accounting for a large share of total points.

Game Flow and Team Totals

Team totals give shape to the matchup.

Chicago often records a higher rushing share, while Washington leans more on passing volume. Total yardage gaps remain narrow, which explains why many meetings finish close.

Time of possession varies by season, though longer Chicago drives usually coincide with reduced Washington snap counts. Penalty totals stay moderate for both teams, keeping pace steady.

Turnovers play a major role when present. Games without giveaways tend to remain tight through the final minutes.

Chicago Bears Player Performance Stats

Chicago player output reflects a controlled offensive approach supported by physical defense.

Bears Quarterback Passing Stats

Bears quarterbacks usually finish with moderate passing attempts. Completion totals stay steady due to short-route usage. Passing touchdowns often come from goal-line timing rather than deep throws.

Interceptions appear under pressure or late-game situations rather than early possessions. Sack totals fluctuate depending on Washington’s front alignment.

Bears Rushing Production

Rushing output remains central to Chicago’s offense. Running backs carry consistent volume, with quarterback rushing adding situational yardage. Yards per carry remain stable rather than explosive, pointing to sustained drive movement.

Red-zone rushing attempts account for a notable share of Chicago’s touchdowns in this matchup.

Bears Receiving Output

Receiving stats show spread usage. Slot targets and short sideline routes account for many catches. Yard totals stay balanced across receivers rather than funneling to one player.

Tight ends contribute primarily inside the red zone, while wide receivers handle third-down conversions.

Bears Defensive Stats

Defensive numbers highlight tackle volume. Linebackers often lead in combined tackles due to extended defensive series. Sack totals vary, with pressure created through scheme rather than individual dominance.

Interceptions occur when Washington quarterbacks are forced into late reads.

Bears Special Teams

Field goal accuracy remains consistent in this matchup. Punt averages reflect field position battles rather than distance alone. Return yardage stays limited, keeping starting field position neutral.

Washington Commanders Player Performance Stats

Washington’s stat profile reflects passing balance and defensive coverage emphasis.

Commanders Quarterback Performance

Washington quarterbacks post higher passing attempts compared to Chicago. Completion rates stay reliable due to quick release timing. Passing touchdowns usually arrive through structured route concepts.

Interceptions remain limited when protection holds. Sack totals rise when edge pressure disrupts timing.

Commanders Rushing Output

Rushing attempts are split across multiple players. Yardage spikes appear on outside runs rather than interior lanes. Quarterback rushing adds hidden yards during broken plays.

Goal-line rushing efficiency shapes touchdown totals more than carry volume.

Commanders Receiving Stats

Receiving production spreads across the depth chart. Tight ends and slot receivers see steady involvement. Long gains come from coverage mismatches rather than isolation routes.

Yards after catch play a role in sustaining drives.

Commanders Defensive Stats

Defensive stats show high involvement from linebackers and safeties. Pass breakups outnumber interceptions in many meetings. Sack totals come from multiple defenders rather than one focal rusher.

Tackle counts increase during games where Chicago controls possession.

Commanders Special Teams

Kicking accuracy remains steady across meetings. Punt coverage limits return gains, keeping field position battles tight.

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Player Metrics

Advanced stat views focus on efficiency and workload rather than volume.

Yards per play often differ by small margins. Third-down success rates frequently explain scoring differences. Red-zone conversion rates shape final scores more than total drives.

Explosive plays appear less frequently in this matchup compared to league averages, pushing games toward possession control.

Match Leaders and Individual Output

Across recent meetings, passing yard leaders often come from Washington, while rushing leaders more often represent Chicago. Receiving leaders vary by coverage assignments.

Defensive tackle leaders rotate by season. Sack leaders shift based on game plan rather than personnel alone.

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats Today

Searches including “today” usually refer to the most recent game, even weeks later. The latest meeting shows both teams relying on short passing, balanced rushing, and disciplined defense.

Stat lines from the most recent game show limited separation in total yards. The deciding factor often comes from red-zone execution or late-game possession control.

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats All

This matchup rewards full stat review rather than highlights alone.

Complete stat sheets include:

• Passing, rushing, and receiving output
  
• Defensive tackle distribution
  
• Sack and pressure data
  
• Special teams contribution
  

Viewing all categories together explains how momentum shifted across quarters.

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats ESP

Many fans search using shorthand terms like “esp” when looking for box scores. This page mirrors a traditional stat-table layout while keeping player output grouped clearly by role.

The focus stays on accuracy, structure, and easy comparison.

Bears vs Commanders 73–0

The 73–0 Bears victory over Washington remains one of the most discussed games in league history. Played during the 1940 NFL Championship Game, it stands as the largest margin of victory in a title game.

Player stats from that game show extreme possession control, dominant rushing output, and defensive pressure that limited Washington to minimal production.

This game often appears in search results due to its historical weight rather than modern relevance.

Bears at Commanders 2025 Context

Year-based searches often point to the most recent season. The Bears at Commanders 2025 meeting reflected modern roster construction, with mobile quarterback usage and spread formations influencing stat lines.

Player metrics from this game show balanced output rather than single-player dominance.

Historical Trends in Bears vs Commanders Matchups

Across decades, this matchup has shifted styles.

Earlier games leaned toward heavy rushing. Modern meetings favor controlled passing and situational mobility. Defensive adjustments reduced explosive plays over time, increasing the value of efficiency.

Turnover margin remains the most consistent predictor of outcome across eras.

Why Player Stats Matter More Than Final Scores

Final scores hide context. Player stats show:

• Who controlled tempo
  
• Which drives stalled
  
• Where defensive pressure landed
  
• How red-zone chances were used
  

For Bears vs Commanders, this context explains repeated close finishes.

Conclusion

Chicago Bears vs Washington Commanders match player stats provide a clear record of performance beyond the scoreboard. Rushing balance, passing efficiency, and defensive workload shape outcomes more than raw totals. Whether reviewing the latest game, past seasons, or historic moments like the 73–0 championship, player stats remain the most reliable reference point for understanding this matchup.

FAQs